Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -ValueCore
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-15 20:13:43
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (9228)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Can the 2024 Kia EV9 electric SUV replace a gas-powered family hauler?
- George Latimer wins NY-16 primary, CBS News projects, beating incumbent Jamaal Bowman
- 5 charged with sending $120K bribe to juror in COVID fraud case
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- 2024 NBA draft: Grades and analysis for every round 1 pick
- Teresa Giudice’s Daughter Milania Graduates High School—And We Bet You Feel Old AF
- Wisconsin youth prison staff member is declared brain-dead after inmate assault
- Trump's 'stop
- Whoopi Goldberg fake spits on 'The View' after accidentally saying Trump's name
Ranking
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Former Boston attorney once named ‘most eligible bachelor’ convicted of rape
- Spurs select Stephon Castle with fourth pick of 2024 NBA draft. What you need to know
- The Supreme Court rules for Biden administration in a social media dispute with conservative states
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Here's how to save money on your Fourth of July barbecue
- Biden’s asylum halt is falling hardest on Mexicans and other nationalities Mexico will take
- Batteries and Rooftop Solar Can Lead to Huge Savings for the Entire Grid. A New Study Shows How—and How Much
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
3rd lawsuit claims a Tennessee city’s police botched investigation of a man accused of sex crimes
Texas added more Hispanic, Asian and Black residents than any other state last year
Judge dismisses sexual assault lawsuit against Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Valerie Bertinelli is on 'healing journey' after past 'toxic' relationships
Billy Ray Cyrus, Firerose accuse each other of abuse amid contentious divorce
Which nation spends the most on nuclear weapons?