Current:Home > FinanceTrendPulse|Alabama Town That Fought Coal Ash Landfill Wins Settlement -ValueCore
TrendPulse|Alabama Town That Fought Coal Ash Landfill Wins Settlement
Algosensey View
Date:2025-04-09 10:46:25
The TrendPulselatest chapter of a long fight between the residents of Uniontown, Ala. and the coal ash landfill that they say is ruining their town resulted in a settlement approved by a federal court on Tuesday.
The settlement resolves a $30 million defamation suit the landfill company filed in 2016 against four residents who had spoken out against it. The American Civil Liberties Union represented the residents, calling the suit an example of the “systematic racial and environmental injustice” that black people have faced throughout the nation’s history. Uniontown is 91 percent black, with a median household income of $14,605—less than a third of the national median.
As part of the settlement, Georgia-based Green Group Holdings, which owns the Arrowhead landfill, is dropping the $30 million claim. In addition, the company has agreed that it will post public notices before receiving potentially hazardous waste products and it will continue to use EPA-approved standards to seal off future shipments of coal ash. All that the defendants were ordered to do was post a joint statement about the settlement on their website and Facebook page.
“What this is is an unequivocal victory for our clients,” said Lee Rowland, a senior staff attorney for the ACLU who worked on the case.
Officials from Green Group Holdings did not respond to a request for comment.
Michael Smith, who represented Green Group Holdings, previously told InsideClimate News: Plaintiffs “have knowingly made false and defamatory statements with the intent to do damage to our business and reputation.”
The Arrowhead landfill has been accepting coal ash since 2008, when a dam broke at the Tennessee Kingston Fossil Plant, unleashing millions of gallons of coal ash that was eventually carried by the trainload 300 miles southwest to Uniontown. Coal ash, the byproduct of coal-fired power plants, contains manganese, selenium and arsenic, which can affect the reproductive and nervous systems as well as cause cancer. According to the EPA, people living within a mile of unlined coal ash storage ponds have a 1-in-50 risk of cancer—more than 2,000 times what the EPA considers an acceptable limit.
The residents of Uniontown have fought the landfill for accepting the ash, taking their complaints to the state and filing lawsuits and Civil Rights Act complaints. A grassroots organization called Black Belt Citizens Fighting for Health and Justice set up a Facebook page and began voicing their concerns about the landfill there. Green Group Holdings sued four of those residents for defamation based on the Facebook posts.
Residents say they have been plagued by a series of health problems since the landfill began accepting coal ash: asthma, headaches, rashes, neuropathy and even death of pets. The lawsuit, known as a strategic lawsuit against public participation, or SLAPP suit, sought to silence the opposition to the landfill. Twenty-eight states have enacted protections against SLAPP suits because they can infringe on First Amendment rights, though not Alabama.
Benjamin Eaton, 57, was one of the residents sued. “I am very happy and glad that this is over,” Eaton said. “My wife is even more happy.” Though he said he was relieved to no longer have the $30 million lawsuit dangling over his head, Eaton said he had stayed optimistic throughout. In the eight years since coal ash started coming to Uniontown, the settlement is the first time they have had what he considers a legal win.
Of the environmental protections that are included in the settlement, Eaton said, “It’s not all that we would have liked to have gotten out it, but it should make a difference.” He wants coal ash to stop being brought into the community, and said that with this lawsuit behind him, he and his organization will continue to work for that.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Benjamin Eaton sued in this case. He was one of the residents who was sued by the landfill company.
veryGood! (2755)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Wild ’N Out Star Ms Jacky Oh! Dead at 33
- Dangers of Climate Change: Lack of Water Can Lead to War
- US Declares Greenhouse Gases a Danger to Public Health and Welfare
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Judge Blocks Trump’s Arctic Offshore Drilling Expansion as Lawyers Ramp Up Legal Challenges
- See Inside Millie Bobby Brown and Jake Bongiovi's Engagement Party
- After the Hurricane, Solar Kept Florida Homes and a City’s Traffic Lights Running
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Climate Science Has a Blind Spot When it Comes to Heat Waves in Southern Africa
Ranking
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- The Newest Threat to a Warming Alaskan Arctic: Beavers
- Is a Conservative Climate Movement Heating Up?
- ‘Is This Real Life?’ A Wall of Fire Robs a Russian River Town of its Nonchalance
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Lily-Rose Depp Recalls Pulling Inspiration From Britney Spears for The Idol
- Kim Cattrall Returning to And Just Like That Amid Years of Feud Rumors
- Five Years After Paris, Where Are We Now? Facing Urgent Choices
Recommendation
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Some Fourth of July celebrations are easier to afford in 2023 — here's where inflation is easing
Senate investigation argues FBI, DHS officials downplayed or failed to properly share warnings of violence on Jan. 6
Jenna Dewan Pens Sweet Message to Her and Channing Tatum's Fierce Daughter Everly on 10th Birthday
Small twin
Climate Change Could Bring Water Bankruptcy With Grave Consequences
Get These $118 Lululemon Flared Pants for $58, a $54 Tank Top for $19, $138 Dress for $54, and More
The hospital bills didn't find her, but a lawsuit did — plus interest